Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Who Gets to Decide Whom the Media Is? Part 13, White House Media Affairs

What’s Wrong With This Picture?

Office of Media Affairs
September 17, 2010

President Obama to Continue His Conversations with Middle-Class Families Focus on Moving the Economy Forward
WASHINGTON -- Later this month, the President will continue his conversations with middle-class Americans with stops in New Mexico, Iowa, and Virginia. Throughout the summer, President Obama has met with families to listen to their concerns and to discuss specific ways to jumpstart job creation and strengthen the middle class. He met with residents of Fairfax, Virginia, earlier this week, and families in Columbus, Ohio, in August.
During this upcoming trip, the President will continue his focus on moving the economy forward and getting people back to work, while rebuilding a strong economic foundation to ensure future prosperity for all Americans.
The President will participate in events in Albuquerque, New Mexico, on September 28, and Des Moines, Iowa, and Richmond, Virginia, on September 29. More details about the President’s travel, including press credentialing information, will be released in the coming days.
Upon RSVPing The White House Media Affairs Office’s on-line form, it requested as series of pretty standard questions, which have existed from administration to administration; except there was a choice, of what kind of journalism is being practiced. It is a holdover from the 2008 Obama campaign; there was an option for “Blogger Reporter.” I opted for Still Photographer and in the media outlet option wrote Freelance.

The White House Media Affairs Office e-mailed:
The Monday evening arrival and Tuesday afternoon departure of Air Force One in Albuquerque as well as the discussion on the economy will be open to pre-credentialed media. However, space for the discussion is limited. The meeting will be pooled press. The arrival and departure of Air Force One as well as the discussion on the economy are closed to the public.
President Obama’s discussion on the economy, event with the Andy Cavalier family and neighbors in the South Valley was pooled for television, still photography, and print. I did not request credentials for the Tuesday morning event because of the pool protocol. The pool differs a little on the road than it does at the White House; it includes local members of the media.

In D.C., the White House press pool is selected by members of the respective disciplines of the media through the White House Correspondents and the White House Press Photographers Associations.

White House news magazine photo pool was reduced in the past couple of years when U.S. News & World Report and Newsweek withdrew from their arrangement. Television networks alternate in providing coverage for the pool. If there is an opportunity for a one-on-one interview with the president at the local level the local pool TV photographer will provide the images to the other participating stations.

Not permitting pool access won't deter a dedicated and resourceful photographer.
The Albuquerque Journal’s Jim Thompson, here with Associate Director White House Press Advance Brandon Lepow was the local pool still photographer on Tuesday. Lepow escorted Thompson from the rear of Air Force One after the D.C. pool was loaded onto board. Thompson had ridden with the pool in the motorcade from the day’s earlier events.

The Journal’s Sean Olsen was the print pool reporter.

Traditionally, the pool is selected by the print writers, radio reporters, television, and still photographers; organized by a local press club or through a coordinated effort. One of the conditions of being the pool photographer is you must share all your work with those who could not attend. Local television stations already have pools in effect, especially to cover Metropolitan Court arraignments.

Pools are also used during campaigns, especially after a front-runner attracts more press coverage and when a nominee is selected.

Republican Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain made a brief stop in Albuquerque on Friday Oct. 3, 2008, to speak at a campaign event at UNM.
A local press pool was assembled and placed in a holding area to ride in the motorcade.
The members were:
Albuquerque Journal Photographer, Pat Cunningham,
KOAT TV Photographer J.P. Hyso, with back turned towards camera,
Albuquerque Journal Government / Politics Staff Writer Daniel Boyd, in the brown shirt,
KOAT Reporter Mike Garofalo on the cell phone,
McCain’s Press Advance Matthew Cohen, monitored and accompanied the local press.
The two men on the right are unidentified and may have been van drivers for the motorcade.
As President-elect, Obama spent some vacation time in Hawaii and New Mexico Independent's Matthew Reichbach's look at a December 28, 2008 post by Time magazine's political blogger Mark Halperin, about the sometimes mundane nature of being a member of the press pool.

As much as I would have liked to cover the backyard gathering and the stop at Barelas Coffee House, I would have declined being the pool still photographer, mostly because I would not have been willing to put myself under the deadline, which is required. I have no complaint about Thompson’s selection, but though I got Olsen’s cryptic notes, through the White House Office of Media Affairs, I saw no pictures from Thompson.

The reasoning for making independent photographs is to be an eye witness. I, like every other news outlet, try to bring my viewers the best images and words I can. Those who follow a particular outlet or, hopefully, several outlets, do so for a variety of reasons. The reasoning may include quality of work, tone, and a certain attachment to the style of coverage.

Politics, like many other human endeavors, are a form of theater. People try to put forth their best appearances, be it: attractiveness, fashion, style, manner, eloquence, candor, approachability, friendliness, and other qualities, and characteristics. Intentionally or not; honestly or disingenuously, it's all an act.

Some of us are iconoclasts, we attempt to penetrate the mask worn by our public officials in the public theater. We seek to show those moments, as brief as they may be, that reveal the true nature of the person, Don't read "true nature" as a bad thing, only that it is contrary to the role individuals try to project.

The highest level of political theater is the attempt for politician to appear to be open honest and candid. Those who do it well are probably accepted by the public better and judged on their words and actions rather than any sight of possible manipulation.

The use of "security" for politicians plays a big role in how the public theater is staged.

To my friends in the security business, I am not attacking the importance of or your role in protection, just mentioning the fact security is a reality that represents part of the staging.

Some administrations at different levels: international, national, state and local levels have been able to assimilate security with those whose job it quite literally is to prepare the stage.
As seen above when President Obama made a May 2009 visit to Rio Rancho High School three years ago, a Secret Service Special Agent, left and Associate Director White House Press Advance Lepow, right, stood at the front of the hall and assessed the crowd just before the formal introduction began.

In the instant media world of coverage, even the crowd is part of the stage, and they must be ready to play their roles, on cue, and without missing a beat. The use of a shill, someone planted in audiences, during the first year or so in office, followed the campaign tradition, in large crowds, of yelling out, "we love you, Mr. President," to which Obama would respond, "I love you right back." it happens less frequently now.
However, Chief White House Photographer Pete Souza, the president’s official photographer, has access and his images of such closed events are sometimes provided to the media as handouts.

Some think this unacceptable in a free society that claims to believe in the principles of a free press.

Associated Press, Reuters, and other news organizations, refuse to put Souza’s images, handed out by the White House Press Office, on their wires citing they are not the result of independent journalism, but official government photos.
Souza, was a staff photographer for the Chicago Tribune, and assistant professor of photojournalism at Ohio University's School of Visual Communication, before becoming the White House photographer. He supported the NPPA’s stand against accepting handout photos. Souza had also been one of four rotating White House photographers during the Ronald Reagan Administration.
After President Barack Obama officially announced the killing of Osama Bin Laden on national television, May 1, 2011, he reenacted his walk to the East Room and read the first several paragraphs of his speech for the benefit of the assigned still photo pool.

This was not a new practice, but it wasn't a truth either.

Reuters White House photographer Jason Reed detailed his experience on his Jason's feed, blog posting, "Ready to record history." The other pool photographers were: Associated Press, Pablo Martinez Monsivais, AFP’s Chris Kleponis, The New York Times’ Doug Mills, and freelancer Brendan Smialowski filling the ISP (Independent Still Photographer)'s slot.

The discussion of photographers reenacting the television event exploded, the ethics of the practice of access to the President's events by White House Press photographers was called into question. Poytner Institute's Al Tompkins wrote, Reuters, AP photojournalists describe staging of Obama photo.

It's not a new issue, as observed by, White House: A Chance To Start Over, an editorial by News Photographer Magazine Editor Donald R. Winslow, who also wrote a more recent series of articles on the issue:
White House, Photographers, Agree On New Presidential Pool
The first White House Photographer Cecil Stoughton, a Captain, then Major in the Army Signal Corps, assigned to the Office of the Naval Aide to the President, became President John Kennedy’s in house photographer; he also served President Lyndon Johnson until 1966.

Stoughton’s handout photograph of Johnson’s swearing in on Air Force One just hours after Kennedy’s assassination probably was his signature piece.

Stoughton also had a run-in with President Richard Nixon at the January 20, 1973, second inaugural. Stoughton was working as chief photographer at the National Parks Service and went to the inauguration to photograph the swearing in.

A secret service agent told him to move, so he did. He went down the main aisle knelt down and took his picture; only problem was he was wearing a bright blue and orange plaid jacket and he was in the background of Ollie Atkins’ “official photograph.”

It’s not the first time that photographers of presidential inaugurations had distractions in the background of their pictures.
My picture of the swearing in, above, was taken from ground level, while the “official” photographer was on a tiered platform some 25 to 40 feet above the ground, below left. Those photographers had a downward angle on the scene and caught Stoughton in their frame.
This was two years after I shot Governor Bruce King’s first inauguration, January 1, 1971. I irritated the Journal’s Ray Cary and Tribune’s Al Cabral and some TV photographers after securing a safety shot from the front, as King raised his hand to his oath. I knew I could not compete with the daily papers, if I stayed where I was. My picture would have been the same old thing only days later. So I went around to the back of the podium shooting what is known as a “Hail Mary” with my camera stretched at arm’s length above my head. My camera got into the other photographer's shots. King’s wife, Alice, selected my image as “the official inaugural photograph.”
Listed as the first civilian “official” White House Photographer, is Yoichi R. Okamoto who served President Johnson from 1966.

Ollie Atkins served as personal photographer to President Richard Nixon and Chief of the White House Photographic Staff;
David Hume Kennerly served President Gerald Ford, Kennerly gave a talk at the 2000 annual National Press Photographers Association's conference in San Francisco. about winning the 1972 Pulitzer Prize for feature photography for his coverage of the Vietnam War for United Press International;

President Jimmy Carter had no official White House photographer;
current Chief White House Photographer Pete Souza also served during Ronald Reagan’s second term, as part of a four photographer rotation;

David Valdez served Vice President, then President George H.W. Bush;

Robert McNeely was Director of White House Photography serving President Bill Clinton for five and a half years and was replaced by Sharon Farmer; and
Eric Draper served as Special Assistant to the President and White House Photo Director for George W. Bush. Draper had unlimited access to Bush; every meeting, every phone call, was photographed. He is seen above during a Bush political visit to Albuquerque, his hometown, in 2008.
Souza, is a very good photojournalist, with what photographers call having a “good eye.”

However, the issue is not about Souza or the quality of his work; it is about the attitude of an administration claiming to be more transparent than any before in not allowing a free press to view, show and report upon what they independently observe.

The above tightly cropped photograph of Souza appears to be out of focus due to a combination of slight subject movement and more camera shake. The time was 6:55 pm and sunset was 6:57 pm, which means most of the sun was already below the horizon. The president’s party was in the shadow of a hanger and it was getting dark.

This picture was taken with the camera on a mono-pod using a Reflex-Nikkor 500mm f/8 at a 1/15 second.

Yet, upon close inspection you will note that Souza’s eye is in sharp focus, the result of one of the White House photo pool using a flash at the very moment my shutter was open. It becomes one of my personal series, “sharing the light.”

Though it would appear that the combination of long lens, small aperture, slow shutter speeds, would make this a near impossible shot, it wasn’t, as this accompanying picture shows, taken just a minute later 6:56 pm, at a 1/20 second.
Souza has the dream job, he is no longer a photojournalist, by definition, he now documents for history. He works for the nation, appointed by the president and by agreement is allowed to cover him with total access: boundaries are left to Souza’s discretion.

There is a trust issue that a photojournalist does not grant their subjects; if a president has an incident, like Ford stumbling down an airplane stairway, or hitting a spectator with his golf ball during celebrity-pro golf game, or H.W. Bush throwing up on the Japanese Prime Minister, or George W. Bush crashing or falling from his bicycle on slippery pavement, injuring a Scottish police constable, an official photograph is unlikely to be made available. A photojournalist’s coverage may be published as news, in reporting on the continued health of the presidents or their injuring people through their actions.

I was granted trust and access when I did a “fly on the wall” photo essay in 1973, of then rookie U.S. Senator Pete Domenici. It wasn’t total access, and he was concerned when I photographed him with a drink in his hand, because constituents on the east side of the state did not know he drank. I told him I didn’t know if he was drinking liquor or ice water and if his constituents found out, then they found out. Until now I never revealed that this had been an issue for Domenici. I have it on good authority, from one who was closely involved in east side Republican politics that Domenici regularly drank with his major campaign contributors. It clearly wasn’t an issue for his east side constituents as he was reelected five more times by substantial margins.

Despite not being able to gain access to closed GOP caucus meetings or the 1973 secret briefing from National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger on the Vietnam War, Domenici made himself and his family available to my photography.
Souza shadows the president as Assistant Deputy of the White House Photo Office Chuck Kennedy, above and below, shadows Souza.
Kennedy's role, is wingman to Souza. While Souza is in close, Kennedy opts for different angles, as he did here during President Obama's visit to Rio Rancho High School. Kennedy photographed from a balcony where no one else was allowed by the Secret Service.

Kennedy may be best known for his 2009 inaugural photo the Obama family during the swearing in taken for the McClatchy/Tribune family of newspapers.
I received two messages from the White House Media Affairs Office (combined):
RSVP CONFIRMATION: Air Force One Arrival (and Departure):
Thanks for your RSVP to the Arrival (and Departure) of Air Force One in Albuquerque, New Mexico. The names your outlet submitted for credentials have been confirmed. Be sure to bring a government issued photo ID for entry and note the times below you must be on site for access.

Though I am not eligible to be a member of the White House News Photographers Association, because one has to live within 40 miles of the White House, I support their code of ethics.

In WHNPA’s Constitution Article III Codes of Ethics (Revised 2005) preamble statement of ethics:
The White House News Photographers Association, a professional organization dedicated to the support of photojournalism and to ensure the rights of its members in the performance of their duties, strongly believes in the public's natural and legal right to freedom in searching for the truth and the right to be accurately and completely informed about the world in which we live. We believe that there is a direct linkage between the survival of a democratic society and an accurate and free press. To that end, we believe that the public journal is a public trust and that all connected with it are to the full measure of their responsibility trustees for the public. We believe that motion and still pictures are an indispensable means of informing people about their world. We strongly urge and expect our members to maintain the highest standards of ethical conduct in serving the public interest. To that end, all WHNPA members must aspire to the following code of ethics:
Click to read the eight points of ethics that apply well beyond White House news photographers, applying equally to other photographers and journalists of all media. I also support the codes of ethics of two organizations to which I do belong: the Society of Professional Journalists, and the National Press Photographers Association.

Part 12 September 26, 2010, Congregation Albert gubernatorial debate

Friday, January 27, 2012

Who Gets to Decide Whom the Media Is? Part 12 September 26, 2010, Congregation Albert gubernatorial debate

What’s Wrong With This Picture?
September 26, 2010
Ched MacQuigg and I went to cover Congregation Albert’s gubernatorial debate and ran into a brick wall.
We were met by several official greeters at the front door. Upon seeing our camera equipment, asked if we were press and directed us to a side door being used as the media entrance.
Democratic Party of New Mexico Press Secretary James Hallinan blocked the side door and said there was an authorized media list that the Congregation Albert's Brotherhood group put together and sent us around to the front door again.
The official greeters for the Brotherhood said that there was an "official" list, but they hadn't generated it, the campaigns did.
Rick Nathanson stepped forward and said bloggers were not on the list; he invited us in, but not with our cameras.
Contrary to any journalistic creed, MacQuigg and I decided to go listen.
We dumped the equipment in the vehicle, but the doors were closed when we returned moments later because it was 11 am. Nathanson had gone back into the building without informing the doormen of what he had told us.
I spoke with Congregation Albert's Administrator Paula Hollonger (above, right, speaking with MacQuigg) about not having gotten through their automated phone system late in the week.
Reason: Thursday was the end of the Jewish High Holy Days. She said that there had been such a deluge of phone calls that with the pressure to set up for the debate the recorded phone calls had not been listened to.
MacQuigg and I waited until the debate finished.
“Bloggers were not allowed,” Nathanson, who is an Albuquerque Journal Staff Feature Writer, a Brotherhood member, and the holder of the "official" media list, said after the event. He had the list and was going to show it to us, but when I raised my camera, he wouldn’t show it to us.
MacQuigg and I engaged Nathanson in the first amendment debate; he obviously never had it before. Stopped in his tracks, he had a lot to think about; the difference between his "press organization" and a journalistically based blogger, which he was willing to differentiate from his initial stated bias that “bloggers are ‘all’ opinion based -- therefore can't be journalists,” theory.
Nathanson, as a journalist and church leader makes the same mistake that the various government public information officers make in regards to the First Amendment. They interpose the word "journalist" where the words "freedom of speech or of the press" are found in the First Amendment. Nathanson, the PIOs and many others don't want a free press to include those who publish or post on the internet to be included in the protections of the First Amendment.
“The Brotherhood was forced to make a concession in order to make this event happen,” Nathanson said, blaming the list on the campaigns.
"Let them all in; it was not the Martinez camp,” who insisted on restricting coverage, said Martinez’ Campaign Manager Ryan Cangiolosi, above left with Rob Nikolewski.

“I’ve done everything I can to help you, but it is out of my control.” Democratic lt. gov. nominee Brian Colõn said.
When asked if he was running his campaign, he said, “no.” It seems “you have burned your bridges with everyone,” Colõn said.

Bloggers were allowed in. Nikolewski, Editor of Capitol Report New Mexico told me he got in as media. However, he took no pictures.

Mary Ellen Brodrick of Democracy for New Mexico also got in, though she may not have been recognized in her role as a blogger. She also took no pictures inside because she was seated in the audience, not on press row.
Attorney General Gary King, State Treasurer James Lewis, and former Oklahoma U.S. Senator Fred Harris.
Former New Mexico Governor David Cargo, State Rep. Larry Larranaga, and State GOP Chairman Harvey Yates Jr.
Associated Press Barry Massey, KNAW FM General Manager, former City Councillor and outgoing County Commissioner Michael Brasher, and Albuquerque Journal Photographer Adolphe Pierre-Louis.
State Sen. John Ryan, (R) Bernalillo and Sandoval Counties, talks with Martinez’ Field Operations Director Adam Deguire as the debate ends.
Democratic Party Chairman Zavier Gonzales talks on his cell phone, as he is one of the last to leave Congregation Albert.
So, What’s Wrong With This Picture?
MacQuigg would post on Sunday, September 26, 2010:
MacQuigg wrote:
I asked Denish Spokesman James Hallinan to either confirm or deny that he had sent a slanderous e-mail to APS Executive Director of Communications Monica Armenta claiming that I called him one of Denish's "evil henchmen.”
Hallinan’s exact words in reply as part of a forwarded e-mail exchange, attached to an e-mail to Janice Arnold-Jones from Armenta, were:
Thank you for everything and for being so accommodating. You and your team did an amazing job! I know Diane will be getting in touch with you all as well to express her gratitude. Ched is something else. He has blogged about me several times too and even called me Diane's evil henchman! I agree with everything you said about him, he is certainly irrational and dangerous. Sorry he caused problems, but last night was a huge success! Thanks, James
A check of MacQuigg’s blog Diogenes' Six, will find only one reference to Hallinan being Diane's evil henchman!, it is in the post, Hallinan will neither confirm nor deny, made more than a week after Hallinan’s e-mail.
MacQuigg posted a story about e-mailing Hallinan three times requesting being placed on the Denish campaign press advisory mailing list. He received no response from Hallinan. MacQuigg wrote:
Until I am convinced otherwise, I hold Lt Governor Diane Denish, here seen promising New Mexicans a Sunshine Portal on state government, personally responsible for the hiding of Media Advisories from "opposition" media.
And I see no reason to suppose that a Denish Roundhouse would behave any differently.
Looks like the Democrats this time; didn't get it totally nailed down.
With Hallinan's comment that it was the Brotherhood, and Nathanson blaming it on the campaigns, the only ones to say they hadn't been involved with the list are the Republicans.
“Thank you for your e-mail, however I am denying your request. Please feel free to visit the candidates' websites for more information,” was Hallinan’s curt response to my prior request to be put on the campaigns media advisory list.
Hallinan’s mere presence, his physically blocking door, his denying media access and coverage at a “open” public event, the message he delivered, that there was an official media list produced by the Brotherhood, and the campaigns had nothing to do with establishing who was on the list, while Nathanson blamed its creation on the campaigns, and Cangiolosi insisting, “it was not the Martinez camp,” restricting coverage, confirms MacQuigg’s allegation, even if he never made it, – Hallinan is Diane's evil henchman!
The obvious question has to be, who’s running the show? Did Congregation Albert extend the invitation to simply allow the campaigns to dictate the terms of how the debate would take place? Campaigns have gotten into the habit of thinking that everybody serves them, when in fact the democratic process of election campaigning is one of the candidates seeking a job from the citizenry.
What if Congregation Albert or any other hosting organization simply said, your welcome to come, the public and media are also welcome to join our congregation, here’s how it will work.... If one or both campaigns throw a fit and one or both candidates back out, so be it. If only one backs, out hold an empty chair debate. Let the public see what kind of openness the candidate are willing to display.
“No,” Colõn said, when I asked if he was running his own campaign? The important part of his answer was he had no influence over the campaign staff. It has to make one wonder, just who is going to make the decisions if he got elected into office.
As I had written Colõn suggesting, “An open campaign is usually a sign of a future open government, while a closed campaign is almost a sure sign of a closed administration.”